We, the members of the Outspoken Oppa Editorial Board, solemnly swear we will uphold the mission of promoting constructive and civil dialogue within all forms of debate. No matter the creed of your religion, the scope of your ideology, the color of your skin, or background, we shall protect the right to freely express opinions and be an outspoken voice in a community. When reporting on the news, we will strive for objectivity.
Article I: Terms of Being an Editor
Section 1: The Executive Editor has authority over anything being published, but the decision to publish in a specific section is ultimately up to the Section Editor.
Section 2: Rough drafts must be appropriate with no profanity, no hate speech, or slander.
Section 3: An Editor must be a Contributor before becoming an Editor.
Section 4: A Contributor must receive a ⅗ majority vote from the Editorial Board to become an Editor.
Article II: Capabilities of the Executive Editor
Section 1: The Executive Editor can edit, write, or publish individual content.
Section 2: The Executive Editor can edit submissions by Contributors, design website pages, and oversee analytics.
Section 3: While the Executive Editor is technically a member of the Editorial Board, the other four Editors are a check on his power.
Section 4: The Executive Editor shall have administrative access to the website, Editorial Board members shall have editorial access, and contributors shall have contributor access. The access and roles of the website are at the discretion of the Executive Editor. The Executive Editor shall also know the passwords of any social media accounts related to the Outspoken Oppa.
Section 5: The Executive Editor reserves the right to pick his successor. A successor has to be a member of the Outspoken Oppa staff but does not have to be an Editor or Editorial Board member, even though it is encouraged.
Section 6: The Executive Editor reserves the right to suspend any Contributor, Editor, or Media Team member (excluding Editorial Board members and Directors) for two days without the permission of the Editorial Board, provided a rationale presented to the Editorial Board. However, a ⅗ vote from the Editorial Board can override a suspension. A suspension may not take place if an Executive Editor is being considered for removal.
Section 7: The Executive Editor reserves the right to call a meeting with the Editorial Board, Media Team, or any staff member of the Outspoken Oppa.
Section 8: Articles representative of the Editorial Board requires a ⅘ majority vote from the Editorial Board. This includes political endorsements, formal announcements, or articles in general. Articles representing the Board should be written by the Executive Editor but can be written by any member of the Board.
Section 9: Contributors may be accepted by the Executive Editor without the vote of the Editorial Board, but their submissions are considered by the Section Editor.
Section 10: Directors and other Media Team members are appointed by the Executive Editor, but ⅘ of the Board can remove any acting Director or member of the Media Team.
Section 11: The Executive Editor is responsible for any annual plans for WordPress or the current website host. He is also responsible for paying for social media promotions and handling the ad revenue.
Section 12: The Executive Editor has final authority on partnerships unless ⅘ of the Editorial Board votes against it.
Article III: Process of Removing a Member of the Editorial Board
Section 1:Any Editorial Board Member can submit a motion to remove the Executive Editor or any other member of the Board.
Section 2: ⅘ of the Board is required to remove the Executive Editor or any other Editorial Board member.
Section 3: No Editorial Board Member, Editor, or Contributor should be hired nor removed until the request to remove the Executive Editor or any other Editorial Board member is fulfilled or denied.
Section 4: When a motion is set to remove a member of the Editorial Board, the Editorial Board must meet and the board member in question shall have a chance to defend themselves. After this, the board shall vote.
Section 5: If the Executive Editor is removed, the Deputy Editor becomes the Executive Editor. The Editor-at-large becomes the Deputy Editor, Managing Editor becomes the Editor-at-large, and the Development Editor becomes the Managing Editor.
Section 6: If a motion to remove the Executive Editor or any other member is denied, then there must be a seven-day waiting period before a motion to remove the Executive Editor or any other member can be made again. This also applies to motions to remove members outside of the Board.
Section 7: The members of the Editorial Board are the Executive Editor, Deputy Editor, Editor-at-large, Managing Editor, and Development Editor. There shall be only five members of the Board, but the title or role of a member can be subject to change.
Section 8: If the motion to remove an Executive Editor is accepted, then that Executive Editor is stripped of his title and membership from the Editorial Board. He reserves the right to remain an Editor but can be removed from his Editor role by 5/5 of the Editorial Board.
Article IV: Grounds for Termination
Section 1: If a motion to remove a Contributor or Editor is submitted, then the Contributor or Editor has the right to appear before the Editorial Board to make his or her case for a maxim time of twenty minutes. A formal vote would then take place after the argument is made.
Section 2: ⅘ of the Editorial Board is needed to remove any Editor and ⅗ of the Editorial Board is needed to remove any Contributor.
Section 3: Removal of any Editor or Contributor on the basis of background or ideology is not allowed.
Article V: Rules for the Media Team
Section 1: The Directors of Photography and Cinema are the head of the Media team, but must still report to the Executive Editor.
Section 2: A report of the projection of the view count by the Head of View Growth will be reported to the Executive Editor at the end of each fiscal quarter.
Section 3: The Director of Photography is in charge of the photography page and photographers.
Section 4: The Director of Cinema is in charge of the video content and any Video Editors. He also can oversee the YT candidates.
Section 5: Drawers, Social Media Managers, or any new positions created within the media team report to the Directors and Executive Editor.
Article VI: Replacing Editorial Board Members
Section 1: If a motion to remove a member of the Editorial Board is passed then ¾ of the remaining Editors must vote to approve a candidate for a new Development Editor.
Section 2: If one or multiple members of the Editorial Board resign, then the candidates that are going to replace them need to be approved by a simple majority of the remaining Editors.
Article VII: Power of Constitution
Section 1: No amendments can be passed ex post facto. The affairs and staff members that predate the ratification of this constitution do not apply to future affairs and are not grounds for termination.
Section 2: This constitution dictates the affairs of the Outspoken Oppa and any violation of this constitution is grounds for termination.
Section 3: 5/5 of the Editorial Board is required to ratify this constitution.
Section 4: Adding amendments or changing amendments to the constitution requires a 5/5 vote from the Editorial Board.
Ethan Kim: Executive Editor
Charlie Park: Deputy Editor
Noah Chun: Editor-at-Large
Edwin Tieu: Managing Editor
Mason Pirkey: Development Editor
Ratified – 9/12/2020
In order to garner a vote, outside influence shall not be a factor. Outside influence includes money, threats against a person, or any other influence that will inhibit a member of the Editorial Board from voting how they originally intended to.
For articles by Editors and Contributors to be retracted, a ⅗ majority from the Editorial Board with rationale is needed.
Section Editors are nominated by the Executive Editor however, candidates must be approved by ⅗ of the Editorial Board before becoming a Section Editor. Article I, Sections 3 and 4 apply to the process of choosing a Section Editor.
In order to remove a Section Editor, a 5/5 vote must be cast by the Editorial Board. When removed, the Section Editor can still be an Editor. If a member of the Editorial Board, he still holds his title, but is stripped from his Section.
Section Editors have absolute power over approving articles to be published in their sections. Section Editors can also choose to move articles out of their sections. A ⅘ vote can be cast to move an article back into a section. However, once an article is published, the necessary steps set out in Amendment II must be followed before a retraction. The Executive Editor can suggest changes, however, the changes are ultimately decided by the Section Editors.
If an article is rejected, a reason must be given and an appeal can be made to appear before the Editorial Board. In order to overturn the rejection, ⅗ of the Editorial Board must approve.
To submit a formal motion, an email or form of communication to the members of the Editorial Board must be written. Motions can also be brought up during meetings. Only members of the Editorial Board can submit a formal motion.
To demote or promote a member of the Editorial Board, a ⅘ vote must be cast. This would mean moving Editor-at-large to Deputy Editor, or any other movements of positions.
Regarding Article II, Section 5, once the Executive Editor has chosen his candidate for his successor, the candidate must present himself or herself before the Editorial Board and promote himself or herself. The candidate is guaranteed to be the successor unless ⅘ of the Editorial Board votes to block him.
A meeting of the Editorial Board must at least occur once every month and is called by the Executive Editor.
When attempting to pass motions not specified in the constitution and having to do with the general welfare of the website, a ⅗ vote is necessary. If it does not meet the approval of the Executive Editor, then a ⅘ majority vote from the Board is required.
For first-level positions, the Board can overrule a rejection or admittance by the Executive Editor with a ⅘ vote.
Section 1: As of the passage of this amendment, “The Central Committee” of the Outspoken Oppa was created. The intent of this Central Committee is to have a non-permanent body to settle constitutional disputes brought up by members of the current Editorial Board.
Section 2: The Central Committee can be convened when at least one member of the current editorial board has a dispute concerning the constitution. When convened, all original members of the editorial board shall be contacted, and they shall decide amongst themselves who shall sit on the trial.
Section 3: Each trial shall have an odd number, three or more, original members of the editorial board. Every time the Central Committee is convened, the convening process outlined in section two must be repeated.
Section 4: One week after being contacted, if at least three retired members of the original editorial board are not able to hear out the dispute, then section three is nullified, and whoever can make it shall sit on the board. If there are only two members and it is split 50/50, then the decision of the member who held a higher position on the editorial board when it was first created will be prioritized.
Section 5: During the time between the dispute and the trial, the status quo prior to the dispute will be maintained.
Section 6: Once the one-week period has elapsed and the members of the Central Committee are decided, then they will set a date for the hearing. The two or more parties involved in the dispute must be present and make their case in front of the Central Committee. Other members of the current editorial board are also able to sit on the hearing and will be allowed to state their opinions. The time allotment for each party will be decided by a majority of the sitting Central Committee; however, each party involved in the dispute must be allowed ten minutes to make their case. The hearing will last as long as it takes for every member of the sitting Central Committee to make a decision.
Section 7: A majority vote of the Central Committee is needed to rule on any dispute. Once a ruling has been decided, that ruling must be followed.